“球星卡”升温，专业从业人员提醒：新手勿跟风******
“球星卡”升温，新手勿跟风
本报记者 孙奇茹
“一张纸片，上面画着人，最贵的那种签名卡竟然能卖好几百万美元！”一位国内著名脱口秀演员在舞台演讲时讲述了自己近期迷上NBA球星卡的故事。近两年来，继潮玩盲盒、球鞋之后，又一个“小众”收藏品开始走向台前——球星卡。
“小卡片”成另类投资新宠？
一张印有运动明星肖像的卡片，能值多少钱？今年8月，棒球名宿霍纳斯·瓦格纳的一张球星卡拍出了725万美元的惊人价格。
球星卡，是以篮球、棒球、足球、网球等多项运动为主的顶尖运动员形象为元素制作的卡片，是一种兼具收藏和投资价值的体育IP衍生品。在诞生之初，球星卡的意义与不少国内消费者儿时从零食包装袋里拆出来的小浣熊卡、水浒传英雄卡并无二致。1880年左右，美国烟草制造商将球员卡作为买香烟的赠品附在香烟盒中，后来球星卡逐渐成为球迷文化的一部分。
记者了解到，球星卡的购买、流通方式有两种：一是通过Topps、PANINI、Upper Deck等具有独家发行权的球星卡发行商购买未开箱的“盲盒”，抽中全球限量、概率低的卡则具备一定的收藏价值；二是购买已开盒、卡面内容已经明确的明卡。
球星卡的销售状况和价格与赛事进展、运动员的个人动态、球星卡发行的稀缺程度等密切相关。有些球星卡有球星签名，会更受欢迎。“球星卡价格还受球星比赛表现影响。如果球星因伤退出这一赛季，球星卡价格也会回落。”一位资深从业者说道。
业内人士透露，球星卡的成熟市场主要在北美，中国市场正处于高速发展中。
兴趣变现带热国内市场
一些较早开始玩卡的国内资深“卡友”，逐渐将兴趣变成了生意，也将这项略显小众的收藏品类逐渐在国内推广。据了解，北京目前是中国球星卡收藏与交易量最大的城市。
张邱昊是北京最大球星卡店的运营副总。从上世纪90年代末在小学门口围观玩具小摊上的球星卡，初中时每天放学逛卡店，到如今运营一家业内知名的球星卡店，他把对球星卡的喜爱玩成了专业。
资深球星卡玩家、T8收藏品廊主理人郑嘉琪从学生时代起就与球星卡结下了不解之缘，从2010年开始有规模、成体系地收藏球星卡，喜欢收藏顶级球星亲笔签名的球星卡。今年8月，郑嘉琪辞去工作开设店铺，专注于球星卡销售，开启了球星卡跨境电商之路。近期，他的店铺在eBay平台上线短短6周，累计销售额就突破20万美元。
“在我们平台上，每秒钟就有3张新的球星卡卡片上线。”跨境电商平台eBay相关负责人说，中国庞大的收藏爱好者和球迷基数，为市场的进一步发展奠定了坚实基础。
不少卡遭遇缩水三分之二
需要留意的是，球星卡价值波动剧烈，新手切忌盲目跟风。一位行业资深人士告诉记者，不少NBA明星球员的卡，都遭遇过从高点缩水三分之二的暴跌行情。
记者获悉，在“兴趣变现”案例的激发之下，部分新手抱着想“低进高出”赚一把的心态购买球星卡盲盒，希望自己能开出高价值的稀有球星卡。然而，一位北京球星卡店店主透露，整箱球星卡往往价格较高，动辄几万元到十几万元一箱，很少有人能直接买下，因此“众筹开卡”“组队开卡”成了卡友之间的常态。即便如此，卡友们也常常因为不断开盲盒的冲动而付出高昂代价。
从事球星卡行业多年的张邱昊提醒：“建议初入门者不要盲目拆盒，可以先从自己喜欢的球星开始买明卡，这才能真正体现体育收藏的价值，盲目追求稀有的球星卡，投入太大，风险也大。”
《北京日报》2022年10月14日第15版
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 大发购彩地图 |
